Meta, formerly known as Facebook, has been under scrutiny from various quarters regarding the veracity of the information that is often shared on its platform. In recent years, the need for fact-checking has become more significant than ever, given the rampant spread of fake news, hoaxes, and misinformation that can cause harm to individuals and societies.

However, Meta’s approach to fact-checking has been under criticism for not being inclusive enough. Its cross-checking program reached out to a very narrow pool of experts and only verified information based on their recommendations. This approach led to a perception that Meta’s fact-checking was an elitist process that did not take into account the diversity of opinions that exist in the world.

Thus, Meta announced a significant shift in its approach to fact-checking, albeit with some caveats. The company has acknowledged that its cross-checking program needs to be more inclusive, and therefore it is reaching out to a broader pool of experts from various fields. The goal is to build a network of fact-checkers that is representative of the world’s diverse thoughts and opinions.

To achieve this, Meta has partnered with several organizations, including the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), to recruit fact-checkers from around the globe. The company has also set up a dedicated team to ensure that the individuals selected for this program have a diverse set of skills, perspectives, and backgrounds. This team will oversee the training of fact-checkers and ensure that they adhere to strict standards and practices.

Meta has also announced that it will expand the scope of its fact-checking program beyond just text-based content. It will include audio and video content, which have become increasingly popular forms of media. This shift is particularly crucial as audio and video can be easily manipulated to spread misinformation or fake news. Hence, the need for a reliable and inclusive fact-checking program that covers all forms of media.

In addition, Meta has stated that this shift is not a one-time initiative but a continuous process. The company aims to adapt and evolve its program based on feedback and the changing needs of society. It has also emphasized that it will remain committed to combating misinformation, hoaxes, and fake news to ensure that users have access to reliable and credible information.

However, while this shift is a step in the right direction, some have criticized Meta for not going far enough. The company has stated that it will continue to rely on third-party fact-checkers to identify questionable content. This approach has often been criticized, as it puts the onus on fact-checkers to identify problematic content, rather than the company taking proactive measures to prevent such content from being uploaded in the first place.

Moreover, there have been concerns about the lack of transparency regarding the selection process for fact-checkers. While Meta has stated that it will ensure diversity in the pool of fact-checkers, it remains unclear how it plans to achieve this goal. Critics argue that a more transparent selection process that involves input from various stakeholders can help ensure that the program is truly inclusive.

Despite these criticisms, there is no denying that Meta’s shift towards a more inclusive and comprehensive fact-checking program is a step in the right direction. The world needs a reliable and credible source of information, and Meta can play a crucial role in providing it. By partnering with a diverse group of experts, expanding the scope of its program, and committing to continuous improvements, Meta can help combat the spread of misinformation and strengthen its position as a platform that values truth and accuracy.

In conclusion, Meta’s move to make its cross-checking program more inclusive and robust is a positive development for social media users worldwide. By partnering with a diverse pool of experts, Meta can ensure that its fact-checking program represents a range of perspectives and opinions. However, transparency in the selection process and proactive measures to prevent the spread of misinformation are areas that need improvement. As Meta continues to evolve its approach to fact-checking, it must remain committed to its goal of providing its users with reliable and accurate information.